APPENDIX K: SAMPLE HIGH RISK
EROSION AREAS ORDINACE
BLUFFLINE VERSION – DEFINITIONS (pp 2-7), ORDINANCE
(pp 8-18)
EROSION HAZARD LINE
VERSION –
DEFINITIONS (pp 20-25), ORDINANCE (pp 26 -38)
PROVIDED BY:
MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES, LAND & WATER MANAGEMENT
DIVISION
DATE: FEBRUARY
1994
MODEL BLUFFLINE APPROACH
Following is model zoning
ordinance language to regulate high risk erosion areas based on structure
setbacks from the bluffline. This is the
approach presently used in all
The model bluffline
ordinance sets forth definitions of 23 terms that are unique to the ordinance
or which may be used differently than how the same term is used in the existing
local zoning ordinance. For that reason,
it is important to integrate these definitions into the local ordinance and
ensure that there is no conflict between the definitions that follow and those
already included in the local ordinance.
Examples of such terms include "lot", "required setback
distance", "setback line", and "nonconforming
structure". Terms that will require
special attention are "accessory structure", "permanent
structure", "principal structure', "readily moveable
structure" and "structure".
If any of these terms are defined differently than those in the local
ordinance, the following approaches could be considered to resolve the
conflict:
1. change the existing ordinance definition to be the same as
those that follow (do this only if it will not alter the meaning of those terms
as applied in other contexts in the local ordinance).
2. add language to the existing ordinance that indicates these
terms have the meaning ascribed only when applied to lots in a designated HREA
and as regulated in Section _________ (the HREA section of the local
ordinance).
3. slightly change the term and then use the sample definition for
the new term (if this is done, be sure to also change the term accordingly
throughout the sample ordinance and be sure to do a thorough search of the
existing ordinance to be sure that the new term is not used elsewhere. For example, "accessory structure"
could be changed to "appurtent structure". This is most easily accomplished using the
search and replace function of a word processor).
Illustrations that accompany
the definitions and the model ordinance language are intended to help clarify
administration and would benefit all affected landowners if included in the
local zoning ordinance. Communities are
encouraged to adopt them as part of the model ordinance language.
There are commentary notes
in [BRACKETS] that must be removed prior
to adoption. These notes refer to
directions for tailoring the model language to a specific community. In most cases they require filling in missing
information, such as the community name.
They also include important notes about considerations that must be
addressed when adapting the model ordinance language to a particular
community. They must all be removed
prior to adoption. All defined words are
italicized in the model ordinance
language.
State of
Township of _________
Ordinance No. ________
HIGH RISK EROSION AREA OVERLAY ZONE
[BLUFFLINE VERSION]
DEFINITIONS
[Amend
Section _____ by adding the following definitions:]
1) Accessory
Structure: a building or other structure, the use of which is incidental to
that of the main building or use of the land. The structure shall not have a
permanent foundation and shall be constructed to be readily movable or removed.
[To avoid conflicts with the existing ordinance, the term appurtent structure
or incidental structure could be used instead.]
2) Bluffline:
the line which is the edge or crest of the elevated segment of the shoreline
above the beach which normally has a precipitous front inclining steeply on the
lakeward side. Where there is no
precipitous front indicating the bluffline, the line of continuous perennial
vegetation may be considered the bluffline (see Figure 1).
3) High
Risk Erosion Area: an area of shoreline which is determined by the
Department of Natural Resources on the basis of studies and surveys to be
subject to erosion and which is designated as such pursuant to the Shorelands
Protection and Management Act, P.A. 245 of 1970, as amended.
4)
5) Lot
of Record: a lot which is part of a subdivision and is shown on a plat or
map thereof which has been recorded in the Office of Register Deeds for
________ [insert name of county] County prior to the effective date of this
Ordinance or the effective date of the high risk erosion designation, whichever
is earlier, or a parcel of land described by survey or metes and bounds which
is the subject of a deed or land contract recorded in said office prior to said
date.
6) Moveable
Structure, Easily: An accessory structure which is smaller than two hundred
twenty-five (225) square feet; is not built on a slab; does not have a
permanent foundation; and is easily removable.
FIGURE 1
Illustration of Key Zoning Terms
Used in the Bluffline Version of the Model High Risk Erosion Area Overlay Zone

7) Moveable
Structure, Readily: a small permanent structure (greater than two hundred
twenty-five square feet and less than three thousand five hundred square feet)
which is designed, sited, and constructed to accomplish relocation at a
reasonable cost relative to other structures of the same size and
construction. Access to and from the
site shall be of sufficient width and acceptable grade to permit the structure
to be relocated. New construction and
installations shall meet the following criteria to be considered readily
moveable structures:
a) The
buildings shall be on pilings, a basement, or crawl space. Except as noted below, a slab-on-grade
foundation does not meet this criterion.
b) Above-grade
walls shall be stud wall construction.
Above-grade walls that are constructed of masonry, including stone
walls, concrete poured or concrete block walls, and brick veneer walls do not
meet this criterion.
Existing permanent structures shall
be considered readily moveable structures if the cost of relocation landward of
the required setback distance is not more than 25% of the replacement cost of
the structure (including any added cost of land) or if the existing structure
meets the criteria for new construction in this subdivision. A 1- or 2-car garage which is bolted to a
slab foundation, which does not have living space within or above the
structure, and which does not have plumbing or interior walls shall be
considered a readily moveable structure if it meets the remainder of the
requirements specified in this subdivision.
Septic systems, tile fields, or other waste-handling facilities are not
readily moveable structures.
8) Nonconforming
Structure: a permanent structure which does not conform to the required
setback distance at the time of high risk erosion area designation or which
became nonconforming due to erosion or became nonconforming due to a change in
the required setback distance. Permanent
structures that are constructed in violation of these rules shall not be
considered to be nonconforming structures.
9) Ordinary
High Water Mark: the line between upland and bottomland which persists
through successive changes in water levels below which the presence and action
of the water is so common or recurrent that the character of the land is marked
distinctly from the upland and is apparent in the soil itself, the
configuration of the surface of the soil and the vegetation. Consistent with
the Great Lakes Submerged Lands Act, P.A. 247 of 1955, as amended, the ordinary
high water mark shall be deemed to be the following elevations above sea level,
International Great Lakes Datum of 1985; for the following Great Lakes and
connecting waterways: Lake Superior - 602.6 feet; Lakes Michigan and Huron -
580.5 feet; Lake St. Clair - 575.3 feet; and Lake Erie - 572.2 feet. (See Figure
2)
10) Parcel:
a continuous area or acreage of land which is under the same ownership at the
time of high risk erosion area designation.
11) Permanent
Foundation: A foundation for a structure that includes all frost free
foundations as regulated by the building code as well as concrete block, poured
concrete, and slabs or other materials used to support the walls of a building,
even if they do not extend down below the frost free line.
FIGURE 2

12) Permanent Structure: any 1 of the
following structures that is erected, installed, or moved on a parcel of
property:
a) A
residential building.
b) A
commercial building.
c) An
industrial building.
d) An
institutional building.
e) A
mobile home.
f) Accessory
and related buildings.
g) Septic
systems.
h) Tile
fields.
i) Other
waste handling facilities.
A permanent structure shall be
considered small if it has a foundation size of three thousand five hundred
(3,500) square feet or less and less than five (5) individual living
units. All other permanent structures
shall be considered large. The term does
not include recreational vehicles or travel trailers. The term also does not include accessory
structures which have less than two hundred and twenty five (225) square feet,
which are used for picnicking or storing of recreational or lawn equipment, and
which are constructed in a manner that facilitates easy removal. The accessory structure shall not have a
permanent foundation and shall not be used as a residential facility.
13) Principal
Structure: the main building on a lot or parcel, including but not limited
to, residential, commercial, industrial, institutional structures and mobile
homes. In the high risk erosion areas described in this Ordinance, principal
structure also includes septic systems, tile fields, any on-site waste handling
facility, garages and any other building designed and intended for permanent
use. [this definition may not be necessary since most ordinances already have
one. if the existing ordinance has a comparable definition it could be dropped.
please note however, that septic systems are treated as if they were a
principal structure.]
14) Recession
Rate: a quantitative measure of the landward movement of the zone of active
erosion determined on the basis of the shoreland erosion studies conducted
under P.A. 245 of 1970, as amended, and expressed in terms of an annual average
rate.
15) Recreational
Vehicle or Travel Trailer: a vehicle primarily designed and used as a
temporary living quarters for recreational, camping or travel purposes,
including a vehicle having its own motor power or a vehicle mounted on or drawn
by another vehicle (Act 96, Michigan Public Acts of 1987, as amended).
16) Required
Setback Distance: the least distance a permanent structure can be
constructed from the bluffline without a special exception. [This could be
called Required HREA Setback Distance if required setback distance is already
used in the local zoning ordinance.]
17) Setback
Line: the line which is the required setback distance landward of the
bluffline and which is the lakeward limit for the construction of permanent
structures without a special exception. [This could be called HREA Setback Line
if setback line is already used in the local zoning ordinance.]
18) Shoreland:
the land, water and land beneath the water which is in close proximity to the
shoreline of
19) Shoreline:
that area of the shorelands where land and water meet.
20) Structure:
anything fabricated, constructed or erected which requires fixation or
placement in, on, or around the ground or to another structure which is affixed
or placed in or on the ground.
21) Substandard
22) Shore
Protection Structure: any structural or physical method used to control
shoreland erosion processes. Shore
protection structures include, but are not limited to, structures such as
seawalls, revetments or bulkheads, and may also include any type of beach
nourishment by filling.
23) Zone
of Active Erosion: the area of the shoreland where the disturbance or loss
of soil and substrate has occurred with sufficient frequency to cause unstable
slopes or prevent vegetation of the area.
ARTICLE ____ HIGH RISK EROSION AREA
OVERLAY ZONE [BLUFF LINE VERSION]
SECTION 1.00 AUTHORITY AND PURPOSE.
__________
[insert name of county, township, city
or village], ________ [insert
county name] County, Michigan under the authority granted in the
__________ [insert reference to
appropriate zoning enabling act; one of the following: county rural zoning
enabling act, p.a. 183 of 1943, mcla 125.201 et seq.; city and village zoning
act, p.a. 207 of 1921, mcla 125.581 et seq.; or the township rural zoning act,
p.a. 184 of 1943, mcla 125.271 et seq.], as amended, and the Shorelands
Protection and Management Act, P.A. 245 of 1970, as amended, enacts the
standards contained herein to protect and regulate high risk erosion areas
identified within the ___________
[insert county, township, city or village].
The
purpose of this Article is to prevent the placement of structures in areas
designated as high risk due to erosion consistent with the Shorelands
Protection Management Act of 1970, as amended.
The standards and requirements contained in this Ordinance, and zoning
map, are intended to further the purposes of the Shorelands Protection and
Management Act, P.A. 245 of 1970, as amended.
It is furthermore, the intent of this Ordinance to [please note that these purposes are somewhat
more expansive than p.a. 245 requires, but are the minimum necessary to justify
the bluffline setback approach described in this sample ordinance.]:
1. Establish
minimum required setbacks for principal and accessory structures, which, based
on erosion studies prepared by the Department of Natural Resources, will reduce
property loss and damage.
2. Minimize
the economic hardships which individuals and __________ [insert name of county, township, city or village] may face
in the case of property loss due to erosion.
3. Protect
public health and safety from effects of shoreland erosion.
4. Protect
water and beach quality.
5. Preserve
bluff vegetation in order to help stabilize bluffs and slow erosion.
6. Provide
for the administration of this Ordinance and to determine the powers and duties
of the Zoning Board of Appeals as relates to this Section.
7. Prescribe
penalties for any violation of the provisions of this Ordinance.
SECTION 2.00 AREA AFFECTED AND
BOUNDARIES. The boundaries of those stretches of
shoreland affected by this Ordinance shall be consistent with the affected
properties described herein. This area
is shown on the official ____________ [insert
name of county, township, city or village] High Risk Erosion Zoning Map
which is part of this Ordinance. A copy
of the Zoning Map and text shall be filed in the office of the ______________ [
For the
purpose of this Ordinance, the minimum required setback distance shall be
measured landward from the bluffline and shall be construed as running parallel
to the bluffline. In the event the
bluffline recedes (moves landward), the setback line of the high risk erosion
area shall also be construed as to have moved landward a distance equal to the
bluffline recession.
The
boundaries of the high risk erosion areas coincide with descriptions provided
in the shoreland erosion studies of the Department of Natural Resources, and
are as follows:
1. High
Risk Erosion Area A - [insert written description of local designated high risk
erosion areas, to coincide with attached hrea map].
2. High
Risk Erosion Area B - [insert written description of local designated high risk
erosion areas, to coincide with attached hrea map].
[example: the north end of the high risk
erosion area shall be at the southern boundary of the
SECTION 3.00 SETBACK REQUIREMENTS FROM BLUFFLINE.
Within the boundaries of the high risk erosion areas established by this
Ordinance, no permanent structure shall be located between the ordinary high
water mark and the line defining the required setback distance indicated in
Table 1 that follows.
1. The
required setback distance provided for in this Ordinance shall be measured in a
landward direction as a distance horizontal from and perpendicular to the
bluffline at the closest point to the existing or proposed principal structure.
For each high risk erosion area described in Section 2.00, the required setback
for any principal structure shall be as follows:
Table 1 PERMANENT
STRUCTURE SETBACKS
Required
Setback Required Setback
Designated High Distance for Small Distance for all
Risk Erosion Area Readily Moveable Other Structures
Structures
(30 year) (60 year)
Area A
1 ______ feet ______ feet
2 ______ feet ______ feet
Area B
1 ______ feet ______ feet
2 ______ feet ______ feet
Area C ______ feet ______ feet
Area D ______ feet ______ feet
Area E ______ feet ______ feet
2. Modification
of the Required Setback Distance. A person who can document with acceptable
engineering studies an annual average recession rate which differs from the
Department of Natural Resources' recession rate data may be granted a
modification of the setback requirement for principal structures by the Zoning
Board of Appeals. Prior to any
modification of the required setback distance, the applicant's engineering
studies shall be sent to the Department of Natural Resources, who shall report
to the Zoning Board of Appeals on the accuracy of the applicant's studies. The Zoning Board of Appeals shall only act
upon requests for modification of the setback requirement after a determination
has been made on the validity of the applicant's data by the Department of
Natural Resources and only after the Zoning Board of Appeals has determined
that such modification would not violate the spirit and intent of this
Ordinance.
SECTION 4.00 GENERAL PROVISIONS.
1. The
erection, relocation or reconstruction of a principal structure on any lot or
parcel which, in whole or part, falls within the area affected by the Ordinance
shall only be used upon receipt of a zoning permit from the Zoning
Administrator pursuant to Section 8.00.
2. No
lot or parcel shall hereafter be created, subdivided or otherwise established
without sufficient depth to accommodate a principal structure in accord with
the requirements of this Ordinance.
Hereafter, all principal structures erected, and all structural
alterations or relocation of existing permanent structures shall be in accord
with the requirements of this Ordinance.
3. The
erection, installation, movement, or enlargement of an accessory structure or a
permanent structure on a parcel, any part of which falls within the area
affected by this Ordinance (within a high risk erosion area), shall be
constructed only after a permit has been issued by the Zoning Administrator of
_____ [insert name of county, township,
city or village]. An easily moveable structure is exempt from these
permit requirements. [Delete this last sentence if your community does not wish
to offer an exemption.]
4.
The permit application shall contain all of the following information:
a) A
legal description of the property.
b) A
description of the proposed accessory and/or permanent structure.
c) A
sketch of the proposed site to scale, which shows the location of the proposed
accessory and/or permanent structure in relation to the location of the
property lines and prominent features.
d) The
signature, phone and address of the applicant in full.
e) Description
of proposed site access.
f) Any
existing or proposed shore protection devices. [please note: a permit from the department of natural resources is
needed for all such devices.]
g) Proposed
or existing location of utility lines, easements and/or right-of-ways.
h) Verification
that the County Health Department and other state and federal permits, as
appropriate have been applied for or obtained for the property.
i) Proof
of property ownership (if the owner is not the applicant, then the legal
interest in the land possessed by the applicant shall be revealed).
j) Inventory
of significant existing on-site vegetation by general type and location.
5. A
permit application to erect, install, or move a permanent structure in a
designated high risk erosion area shall be approved if the proposed permanent
structure meets or exceeds all of the following requirements:
a) The
proposed permanent structure or addition is landward of the required setback
line (see Section 3.00, Table 1).
b) Small
permanent structures that are erected, installed, or moved into the area
between the setback line and a distance twice the required setback distance
shall be readily moveable structures, except for those small permanent
structures located on parcels which do not have access of sufficient width and
acceptable grade to allow for relocation.
c) A
permanent structure shall not be erected, installed, or moved lakeward of the
setback line in a high risk erosion area without a special exception as
provided by Section 6.00.
d) The
proposed permanent structure, meets the requirements of other applicable state
laws, including but not limited to the provisions of the Sand Dune Protection
and Management Act No. 222 of the Public Acts of 1976, as amended, being
281.651 et seq. of the Michigan Compiled Laws.
e) Review
and approval of the design of small permanent structures shall be made to
ensure the building is a readily moveable structure.
6. A
permit application to make an addition to an existing permanent structure in a
designated high risk erosion area shall be approved if the addition meets or
exceeds the required setback distance and all other requirements of this
ordinance for the district in which it is located.
7. Accessory
or appurtenant structures shall not have a permanent foundation, shall be less
than two hundred twenty-five (225) square feet, shall not be more than ten (10)
feet in height and may be used for picnicking or storage of recreational or
lawn equipment. The structure shall not be used as a residential facility. An
accessory structure is exempt from the setback requirements for a permanent
structure. Permitted accessory structures which are placed in high risk erosion
areas shall be removed prior to erosion damage.
8. Any
substandard lot of record or substandard lot described in a land contract or
deed executed or delivered prior to the adoption of this Ordinance shall only
be used if it meets the requirements of Section 6.00.
9. If
a permanent structure is relocated, all construction materials, including the
entire foundation, shall be removed and properly disposed of according to the
terms of a permit issued as a part of the moving operation.
10. After
May 1, 1992, the slope and height of a dune or bluff shall not be artificially
altered to affect the setback requirement unless the alteration is in
compliance with a permit issued pursuant to the provisions of Act No. 347 of
the Public Acts of 1972, as amended, being 281.101 et seq. of the Michigan
Compiled Laws, and Act No. 247 of the Public Acts of 1955, as amended, being
322.701 et seq. of the Michigan Compiled Laws, if the alteration or fill
extends into the waters of the Great Lakes or below the ordinary high water
mark elevation. [please note: the may 1,
1992 date is when the new hrea administrative rules took effect and apply even
if local regulations have not been brought into compliance with the new rules.]
SECTION 5.00 MAINTENANCE AND RESTORATION OF NONCONFORMING
STRUCTURES. The lawful use of any structure existing at
the time in which this Ordinance is adopted may continue in the same manner and
to the same extent although the location of the permanent structure does not
conform with the provisions of this Ordinance.
A nonconforming permanent structure shall not be repaired, restored,
extended, enlarged or removed except in accord with the requirements that
follow:
Section 5.01 Routine Maintenance and
Remodeling. Routine
repairs and maintenance work required to keep a nonconforming principal
structure in sound condition are permitted.
Remodeling of a nonconforming principal structure is permitted as long
as the structure is neither enlarged or extended in a nonconforming manner.
Addition of extra stories shall be construed as the expansion of a
nonconforming use.
Section 5.02 Enlargements to
Nonconforming Structures. The following exceptions can be
made to accommodate enlargements to existing nonconforming structures upon
review and approval of the _________ Zoning Board of Appeals per Section ____.
1. Additions
to a readily moveable structure which is not in compliance with the required
setback distance of a designated high risk erosion area shall be approved if
all of the following provisions are complied with:
a) The
existing building with the addition will meet the definition of a readily
moveable structure.
b) The
proposed addition does not reduce the permanent structure's distance from the
bluffline.
c) The
proposed addition and the existing permanent structure are not less than thirty
(30) feet landward of the bluffline.
2. An
addition to an existing small nonconforming permanent structure which is not a
readily moveable structure shall be approved if, at the date of construction,
the provisions of either subsection (a) or (b) of this Section and the
provisions of subsection (c) of this Section are complied with as follows:
a) The
total of all floor space added shall not exceed twenty-five percent (25%) of
the foundation size of the permanent structure.
The foundation size shall be determined as of the time the permanent
structure became nonconforming. When the
twenty-five percent (25%) limit on additions (including building up) has been
reached, no further additions can be made for the remaining life of the
structure. The addition shall not reduce
the permanent structure's distance from the bluffline.
b) The
addition shall meet the definition of a readily moveable structure and the
addition shall be on the landward side of the original permanent
structure. A special exception may only
be granted if the property owner, as a condition agrees to relocate the readily
moveable portion of the permanent structure to a location landward of the
setback line when so ordered by the Zoning Board of Appeals. The Zoning Board of Appeals may make such an
order only when the foundation of the existing structure is undermined by
erosion.
c) The
proposed addition and the existing structure is not less than thirty (30) feet
landward of the bluffline.
Section 5.03 Restoration of
Nonconforming Structures.
1. When
a nonconforming structure is damaged by a force other than erosion, the Zoning
Board of Appeals shall only authorize restoration if the Board determines that
the structure will be restored in compliance with the following standards:
a) The
cost of returning the principal structure to its original conditions shall be
sixty (60) percent or less of the structure's precatastrophe replacement value. No structure damaged more than sixty (60)
percent of its precatastrophe replacement value shall be restored. [please note: this is the standard from the old
administrative rules. the new rules permit reconstruction up to 100% if it is a
readily movable structure. a local government could retain the old standard
(which is more consistent with most local nonconforming use standards) or could
permit reconstruction if it were to be done as a "readily moveable
structure". however, doing so would make that nonconforming use standard
different from all others in the local zoning ordinance.]
b) The
permanent structure, if rebuilt in its existing location, would be no less than
twenty (20) feet landward of the bluffline.
c) The
reconstructed building would be a readily moveable structure.
2. As
a condition for approval of restoration plans, the Zoning Board of Appeals may
require:
a) Measures
which will aid in stabilizing the bluff other than the construction of erosion
control devices.
b) The
use of runoff or soil erosion control techniques to prevent any acceleration
erosion which may occur during restoration of the structure.
c) The
lawful disposal of all debris including the previous foundation resulting from
the damage or from the restoration of a principal structure (such as
construction materials) in a manner such that the debris poses no safety or
health hazard.
d) Other
conditions on the restoration of nonconforming principal structures, provided
these conditions are consistent with the intent of this Ordinance and
consistent with the promotion of the public health, safety and welfare.
3. If
a building is more than sixty (60%) destroyed or declared a total loss for
insurance purposes, the requirements for new permanent structures shall apply.
[please note, that while local zoning
often precludes reconstruction of a destroyed nonconforming structure, the dnr
hrea rules allow reconstruction even if a structure is destroyed 100%.]
4. Determination
of Replacement Costs. The precatastrophe
replacement value of repairing damage to a nonconforming structure, excluding
contents, damaged by a force other than erosion shall be made on the basis of
an appraisal by a qualified individual designated by the Zoning Board of
Appeals. The cost for such determination
shall be born by the applicant.
SECTION 6.00 EXCEPTIONS ON
NONCONFORMING PARCELS. The following exceptions can be made to the
required setback distance upon review and approval of the _________ [insert name of county, township, city or
village] Zoning Board of Appeals per Section____ . Any exception shall
be the minimum required for the location of a permanent structure on a
nonconforming parcel:
1. To
erect, install or move a small readily moveable structure lakeward of the
setback line on a nonconforming parcel provided the following are complied with
[standards b and d below are especially
important]:
a) If
a sanitary sewer is not used, the septic system, tile field, or other
waste-handling facility shall be located at least as far landward as the lakeward
edge of the building.
b) The
readily moveable structure shall be located as far landward of the bluffline as
possible without violating another provision of this ordinance.
c) The
readily moveable structure shall be designed and constructed in accordance with
proper engineering standards and building moving restrictions applicable to the
subject area. Review and approval of the
design to ensure that the building is a readily moveable structure shall be
completed prior to issuance of any local permits.
d) The
readily moveable structure is not less than thirty (30) feet landward of the
bluffline and is not located on a lakeward facing slope of sixty percent (60%)
or more.
e) The
readily moveable structure meets requirements of other applicable state laws,
including but not limited to the provisions of the Sand Dune Protection and
Management Act No. 222 of the Public Acts of 1976, as amended, being 281.651 et
seq. of the Michigan Compiled Laws.
2. If
a nonconforming parcel does not have access to and from the place where the
structure is proposed to be located of sufficient width and acceptable grade to
erect or move a readily moveable structure, or if the application is for a
large permanent structure on a nonconforming parcel, a special exception shall
be granted to utilize a shore protection structure in place of a portion of the
required setback distance. The special
exception shall be granted only if all of the following provisions are complied
with:
a) If
a sanitary sewer is not used, the septic system, tile field, or other
waste-handling facility shall be located at least as far landward of the
bluffline as the principal building.
b) The
permanent structure shall be located landward of the bluffline as far as
possible without violating another provision of this Ordinance.
c) The
shore protection structure shall be designed to meet or exceed a twenty (20)
year storm event at the site for small permanent structures and a fifty (50)
year storm event at the site for large permanent structures. A professional engineer shall certify that
the shore protection structure has been designed and will be constructed in
accordance with these standards. If the
shore protection structure is constructed in the waters of the Great Lakes or
lies below the ordinary high water mark, a permit pursuant to the provisions of
the Great Lakes Submerged Lands Act No. 247 of the Public Acts of 1955, as
amended, being 322.071 et seq. of the Michigan Compiled Laws, shall be obtained
for the shore protection structure.
d) The
permanent structure shall be a minimum of thirty (30) feet from the shore
protection structure. If the bluff or
dune is unstable due to height, slope, wind erosion, or groundwater seepage,
the _________ [insert name of county,
township, city or village] with input from the DNR may require a setback
of more than thirty (30) feet or an engineered bluff stabilization plan, or
both. In areas of steep slopes greater
than eighteen (18) percent, a greater setback may be necessary to provide
access for maintenance equipment and a safe building site.
e) If
the application is for a large permanent structure, the Zoning Board of Appeals
shall require compliance with both of the following provisions:
1) The
establishment of an escrow account to maintain the approved shore protection
structure or bluff stabilization, or both.
The amount required in the escrow account shall be reasonable and based
on the project design.
2) Notice
in the disclosure statement or deed that a portion of the required setback
distance has been waived.
f) The
proposed permanent structure meets the requirements of other applicable state
laws, including but not limited to the provisions of the Sand Dune Protection
and Management Act No. 222 of the Public Acts of 1976, being 281.651 et seq. of
the Michigan Compiled Laws.
SECTION 7.00 SETBACK EXCEPTIONS FOR APPROVED SHORE
PROTECTION. The following exceptions can be made to the required setback distance upon approval
of the __________ [insert name of county, township, city or village] Zoning
Board of Appeals per Section _____. Any exception shall be the minimum required
for the location of a permanent structure
or a nonconforming parcel. [please note: this section is optional. a
community may not want to provide for such special exceptions. it is very
difficult for a property owner to obtain the required shore protection approval
from the dnr, so the possibility of obtaining such an exception is likely to be
rare. it may be better to leave such exceptions strictly up to the dnr under
their rules.]
1. A
special exception shall be granted, and a portion of the required setback
distance waived, for the installation of an approved shore protection structure
if all of the following conditions are met.
a) A
contract for perpetual care of the shore protection structure is agreed upon by
the property owner or property owner's association and the ___________ [insert name of county, township, city or
village]. The responsibility will
be defined in a written agreement between the ________ [insert name of county, township, city or village] and the
property owner(s). The local agency
shall agree to perform maintenance or repairs to maintain the integrity of the
shore protection structure. The local
agency shall submit to the Department of Natural Resources a financial plan for
maintaining the shore protection
structure.
b) The
shore protection structure is designed and constructed to meet or exceed a
fifty (50) year storm standard. The
design and construction shall be certified by a professional engineer. If the shore protection structure is
constructed in the waters of the
c) A
favorable finding is made by the _________ [insert
name of county, township, city or village] with input by the Department
of Natural Resources (DNR), that a greater public good exists to support the
use of a shore protection structure rather than a natural shoreline in terms of
all of the following:
1) The
preservation of fish and wildlife habitat.
2) The
value to the entire community of a natural shoreline as opposed to the value to
the entire community of additional development that is made possible by the
shore protection structure.
3) The
impact of the loss of sand movement along the shoreline.
4) The
impact on erosion of land in the immediate area of the shore protection structure. Before making the finding, the __________ [insert name of county, township, city or
village] shall hold a public hearing.
Notice shall be sent to all riparians within three-hundred (300) feet of
the proposed shore protection structure and to the Department of Natural
Resources [
d) There
is a minimum of thirty (30) feet from the shore protection structure to any
permanent structure. If the bluff or
dune is unstable due to height, slope, wind erosion, or groundwater seepage,
the ___________ [insert name of county,
township, city or village], with input from the DNR may require a
setback of more than thirty (30) feet or an engineered bluff or dune
stabilization plan, or both. In areas of
steep slopes, a greater setback may be necessary to provide access for
maintenance equipment and a safe building site.
If the parcel has existing permanent structures which are less than
thirty (30) feet from the proposed shore protection structure, there shall be
sufficient access to permit the maintenance and repair of the shore protection
structure.
e) Shore
protection is already a common feature of the shoreline lying within
one-thousand (1,000) feet of the proposed shore protection structure.
[The following Section 8.00 may be unnecessary
as it may duplicate existing ordinance language. If so, it should be deleted.
If it partially overlaps, the overlapping portions should be deleted, but the
balance added to the existing ordinance.]
SECTION 8.00 ZONING ADMINISTRATION.
An enforcement officer shall be duly appointed by the ________ [insert reference to governing body:
1. Issue
a zoning permit when after review of proposed plans and an on-site inspection,
it is determined that the proposed placement and design of a structure complies
with the requirements of this Ordinance.
2. Issue
violation notices requiring compliance within 30 days and initiate any other
activities to abate violations as authorized by this Ordinance.
3. Maintain
permanent and current records of this Ordinance, including all permits applied
for, issued and denied, maintain the zoning maps and property descriptions,
delineate affected areas, maintain records of application for variances,
appeals and the decisions on these appeals by the Zoning Board of Appeals.
4. In
the case of denying a zoning permit, the Zoning Administrator shall inform the
property owner of the right to appeal and the conditions under which an appeal
will be considered. The Zoning Administrator shall further inform the Zoning
Board of Appeals and the Department of Natural Resources at the time an appeal is
filed. Written notice of an exception
request from the minimum required setback distance shall be given to the
Department of Natural Resources at least 14 days prior to the hearing before
the Zoning Board of Appeals. [please
note: such notices should be mailed to the
SECTION 9.00 DISCLAIMER OF LIABILITY.
The provisions of this Ordinance are considered the "minimum"
necessary for reducing erosion hazards and property loss for a thirty (30) year
period of recession for small permanent structures and a projected sixty (60)
year period for large permanent structures or non-readily moveable structures
based upon current engineering and scientific methods of study. Faster or slower rates of erosion may
occur. Erosion rates may be increased by
natural causes such as high lake levels or major storms, or by man-made causes
such as the construction of erosion control devices or by increasing the amount
of runoff from the land. Placing a
structure landward of the required setback distance is not a guarantee or
warranty of safety from erosion damage.
Individual property owners concerned with erosion hazards are encouraged
to consult with local building officials and personnel of the Department of
Natural Resources to arrive at site design plans which may use a greater
setback to maximize protection from erosion damage.
SECTION 10.00 RELATIONSHIP TO OTHER PERMITS.
Approval of a permit does not exempt the applicant from complying with
all other relevant statues, Ordinances, or rules and regulations.
SECTION 11.00 INTERPRETATION
In the
interpretation and application of this Ordinance, all provisions shall be (a)
considered as minimum requirements, (b) liberally construed in favor of the
governing body and (c) deemed neither to limit nor repeal any other powers
granted under State by adding the following definitions:
SECTION 12.00 SEPARABILITY.
If any article, section, clause, provision or portion of this Ordinance
is adjudged unconstitutional or invalid by a court of competent jurisdiction,
it shall be deemed separate and the remainder of this Ordinance shall not be
affected thereby.
SECTION 13.00 VIOLATIONS - PENALTIES.
It shall be unlawful for any person to commence building of any kind
that is in violation of the terms of this Ordinance, and any violation shall be
subject to the penalties herein prescribed.
Any person violating any provision of this Ordinance shall upon
conviction thereof, be punished by imprisonment for not more than ninety (90)
days, or by a fine of not more than five hundred (500) dollars and the costs of
prosecution, or by both in the discretion of the court. Each day that a violation exists shall
constitute a separate punishable offense.
The imposition of any sentence shall not exempt the offender from
compliance with the requirements of this Ordinance. Violation of this Ordinance is hereby
declared a nuisance per se and conviction under the penal provisions of this
Ordinance shall not preclude proceedings to abate such nuisance.
SECTION 14.00 EFFECTIVE DATE
This
ordinance shall become effective 30 days after publication.
Motion by:
Second by:
Yeas (roll call vote):
Nayes:
Date
Adopted:
_________________________________
(Signature,
Top Elected Official)
_________________________________
(Signature,
Clerk)
MODEL EROSION
HAZARD LINE APPROACH
Following is model zoning
ordinance language to regulate high risk erosion areas based on structure
setbacks from the erosion hazard line.
This is a new approach included in the May 1992 administrative rules
under the Shorelands Protection and Management Act.
The model bluffline
ordinance sets forth definitions of 26 terms that are unique to the ordinance
or which may be used differently than how the same term is used in the existing
local zoning ordinance. For that reason,
it is important to integrate these definitions into the local ordinance and
ensure that there is no conflict between the definitions that follow and those
already included in the local ordinance.
Examples of such terms include "lot", "required setback
distance", “setback line”, and "nonconforming structure". Terms that will require special attention are
"accessory structure", "permanent structure",
"principal structure", "readily moveable structure" and
"structure". If any of these
terms are defined differently than those in the local ordinance, the following
approaches could be considered to resolve the conflict:
1. change the existing ordinance definition to be the same as
those that follow (do this only if it will not alter the meaning of those terms
as applied in other contexts in the local ordinance).
2. add language to the existing ordinance that indicates these
terms have the meaning ascribed only when applied to lots in a designated HREA
and as regulated in Section (the HREA section of the local ordinance).
3. slightly change the term and then use the sample definition
for the new term (if this is done, be sure to also change the term accordingly
throughout the sample ordinance and be sure to do a thorough search of the
existing ordinance to be sure that the new term is not used elsewhere. For example, "accessory structure"
could be changed to "appurtent structure". This is most easily accomplished using the
search and replace function of a word processor).
Illustrations that go along
with the definitions and the model ordinance language are intended to help
clarify administration and would benefit all affected landowners if included in
the local zoning ordinance. Communities
are encouraged to adopt them as part of the model ordinance language. Since the erosion hazard line approach is new,
and different from the bluff line approach, it will be critical that the illustrations
(particularly Figures 1-4) be a part of any local zoning ordinance using this
approach.
There are commentary notes in [BRACKETS] that must be removed prior to adoption. These notes refer to directions for tailoring the model language to a specific community. In most cases they require filling in missing information, such as the community name. They also include important notes about considerations that must be addressed when adapting the model ordinance language to a particular community.